Document: Address in Independence at the Dedication of the Liberty Bell
Date: November 6, 1950
During the speech, President Truman mentions the Schuman Plan, saying, “I have been very much interested in the proposal made by the French Foreign Minister, Mr. Robert Schuman, for pooling coal and steel production in Western Europe. I hope very much that this plan can be worked out along the bold lines proposed by that French Foreign Minister, Mr. Schuman.” (emphasis added)
Document: The Secretary of State to Certain Diplomatic Offices
Date: December 8, 1950
In this cable, Sec. Acheson discusses aspects of the Schuman Plan and the US response to it. At one point he remarks, “There are two main trends of opinion in US on Schuman Plan. Dominant one at present is enthusiasm for plan based on political attractiveness. Other view, whose prevalence shld not be underrated, is skepticism as to whether project is anything more than an internatl cartel.” (emphasis added)
Acheson allays the fears of the latter, noting, “So far, it has been possible to insist in good faith that general idea of plan is a single market characterized by competition, and that real auth lies in High Auth, assembly and court, and not in producer groups.” (emphasis added)
US Context: US support for the Schuman Plan was based mainly on two concepts: 1) strengthening the Western European economy, which was especially important in containing communism; and 2) rapprochement between France and the Federal Republic of Germany.
European Context: Six countries were involved in the negotiations to establish the European Coal and Steel Community (ECSC)- Belgium, France, Germany, Italy, Luxembourg, and the Netherlands. In addition to the technical and economic aspects of the negotiations, countries also discussed the role of institutions, in particular a supranational body, the High Authority, as well as other institutions that might check and balance the power of that body.